Hydrodynamic derivatives can be evaluated by using either the 'Multiple-Run' or 'Single-Run' method.
Hydrodynamic derivatives are evaluated by curve fitting the harmonics data obtained from a multiple number of dynamic PMM tests over a range of PMM motion parameters.
Hydrodynamic derivatives are evaluated by solving the mathematic model equations using the harmonics data from a single number of dynamic PMM tests for a fixed PMM motion parameter value.
Ex) pure sway test:
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sway | Yaw |
![]() |
![]() |
Note: 1) Derivatives are scaled (normalized) with the values at Fr = 0.280
2) Δu = -0.51, 0.0, 0.46 corresponds to Fr = 0.138, 0.280, 0.410, respectively.
The validities of hydrodynamic derivatives determined using the MR and SR methods are evaluated by examining the errors in reconstruction of forces and moment data time-histories through the mathematic model.
Reconstruction error is defined as
where
Di is the measured data
Ri is the reconstructed data
1) Sway derivatives reconstructing the pure sway time histories:
2) Yaw derivatives reconstructing the pure yaw time histories:
3) Cross-coupled derivatives reconstructing the yaw and drift time histories:
For MR method, the reconstruction error in general ER (%) < 20 over the entire range of the tested PMM parameters.
For SR method, the error value is typically huge, ER (%) < 600, when PMM motion is small, and relatively large, ER (%) < 50, as the PMM motion becomes large.
Consequently, the MR method is more rigorous than the SR method, and the SR method is only suggested when PMM motion is large enough.