Presentations and Publications LMOS 2017 Team. 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS) Preliminary Findings Report. July 2018. The 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS 2017) was a collaborative, multi‐agency field study of ozone chemistry and meteorology along the Wisconsin‐Illinois Lake Michigan shoreline using a combination of aircraft, ground‐based and ship‐based measurements. The collection of measurement assets deployed is conceptually illustrated at right. The Lake Michigan region has persistently high ozone concentrations that are impacted by complex meteorology and signifi t transport of pollutants. The overall goal of the study was to better understand ozone formation and transport around Lake Michigan to assist researchers and air quality managers who study, predict, and manage ozone concentrations in the region. Two particularly challenging study areas are understanding the factors that determine the size, location, timing, and intensity of ozone-rich air masses, and understanding the details of the chemistry and meteorology that create the sharp gradients in ozone concentrations often observed between the lakeshore and nearby inland locations. Field activities were conducted from May 22‐June 22, 2017 and included two aircraft (one for remote sampling and one for in situ profiling), two ground based super sites (Sheboygan, WI and Zion, IL) outfitted with remote sensing and in situ measurements, three mobile sampling platforms measuring lakeshore‐inland ozone concentration gradients or conditions on the lake surface, and additional ground‐based remote sensing instruments collocated at several other shoreline monitoring locations. Air quality and meteorological forecasts provided flight planning guidance and in‐field evaluation of model prediction skill during the study. Section 1 of this report provides an overview of the
LMOS 2017 study including a summary of objectives and an overview of
the meteorology and lakeshore ozone concentrations during the field
observation period. Section 2 provides a summary of the measurements
conducted during the LMOS 2017 study, along with preliminary results.
Section 3 provides a summary of preliminary comparisons of
photochemical model results with measurements highlighting the
difficulties in predicting coastal ozone concentrations along the
western shore of Lake Michigan. Section 4 provides initial
recommendations for meteorological and photochemical model
configurations to improve the prediction of ozone along the western
shore of Lake Michigan. Key
Findings: Ozone
events. Significant ozone events occurred
during LMOS 2017, with exceedances of the 70 ppb 8-hr ozone threshold
on June 2, June 11-12, and June 14-16. The LMOS 2017 aircraft observed
polluted layers with rapid ozone formation occurring in a shallow layer
near the Lake Michigan surface. Modeling and observations show that
this polluted layer over the lake is an important factor in ozone
exceedance events, but that meteorological and photochemical model
skill in forecasting these needs improvement. Specifically, airborne in situ profiling during selected
events showed high ozone and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) concentrations
within the marine boundary layer over Lake Michigan, whose depth as
determined by in situ temperature profiling ranged from ~50 to ~370 m
above lake level depending on date, time of day, and location.
Comparisons between model predictions and in situ airborne and surface
ozone measurements showed that both National Weather Service (NWS)
Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) and high resolution (4km)
Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) with Chemistry (WRF-Chem)
forecasts underestimated peak ozone concentrations and overestimated
NO2 concentrations during these events. Both NWS and WRF-Chem models
showed persistent underestimates in terrestrial boundary layer (0-3km)
ozone concentrations throughout the LMOS 2017 study. Preliminary
emissions sensitivity studies using the WRF-Chem model suggest that
both reductions in anthropogenic nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions and
increases in anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) improve
model results for peak ozone during LMOS 2017; however, evaluation at
the process level and replication in additional models is necessary.
WRF physics sensitivity studies suggest that the ability to capture the
inland penetration of the lake breeze circulation is dependent on
accurate estimates of the Lake Michigan water temperatures and the
physics options chosen to represent boundary layer mixing and land
surface exchange processes. Sheboygan
Ground Super-site. At Sheboygan a valuable
dataset of continuous wind, temperature, water vapor, and
vertically-resolved aerosol profile was recorded. Meteorological
characteristics of lake breeze penetration were captured in detail,
including during the June 2 ozone exceedance event. In situ chemical
measurements at Sheboygan of ozone, NOx, formaldehyde, and NOx plus its
reaction products (NOy) at 1 minute and finer time resolution captured
peak events, as well as diel cycles in precursors and oxidants, and
wind-shift related changes. Chemicals (formaldehyde and NO2) that can
serve to indicate the chemical regime for ozone formation (i.e., NOx
limited and volatile organic compound (VOC) limited) were measured at
Sheboygan. Substantial variability in the indicators was recorded,
suggesting a complex system with some NOx limited periods, and some VOC
limited periods. However, lake breeze influence within this record is
evident, and the chemical indicators at Sheboygan, when combined with
the supporting datasets are promising for ongoing investigation. Zion Ground Super-site. At Zion, IL, a dataset of continuous wind, temperature, and water vapor vertical profile was recorded. These instruments captured thermal and wind characteristics of lake breeze penetration in excellent detail, including during the June 2 ozone exceedance event. This should provide a useful dataset for future research and model evaluation. At Zion, a comprehensive suite of chemical and physical aerosol characterization was captured. This will be used in ongoing source apportionment analyses and to characterize local influences on the Zion monitoring station. During LMOS 2017, low levels of fine particulate matter dominated by organic matter were recorded, with PM2.5 enhancements often coinciding with ozone enhancements. During the largest lake breeze ozone event, elemental carbon concentrations were enhanced on a relative basis, consistent with a plume including significant combustion influence. Future organic source apportionment should be able to distinguish relative contributions from different combustion source types. Continuous or semi-continuous measurements of ozone, NOx, nitric acid, hydrogen peroxide, and many volatile organic compounds (VOC) and oxygenated volatile organic compounds (OVOC) were conducted. Some prominent VOC and OVOC compounds measured included benzene, toluene, isoprene, monoterpenes, methyl vinyl ketone, and methacrolein. Preliminary analysis of these indicates that the field observation period can be divided into two periods – an initial period of low biogenic influence and higher anthropogenic influence (higher anthropogenic VOCs, low isoprene) up until about June 5. After June 5, conditions shift to a higher biogenic influence with lower concentrations of anthropogenic VOCs. Chemicals (nitric acid and hydrogen peroxide) that can serve to indicate the chemical regime for ozone formation (i.e., NOx limited and VOC limited) were measured at Zion. Background conditions with westerly winds were mainly NOx limited as expected given regional sources of VOCs exceeding regional NOx sources. Lake breeze ozone events exhibited higher VOC sensitivity than other periods, and analyses of these is ongoing. As was the case for Sheboygan, the chemical regime for ozone formation at Zion had a complex time history; however, within this complexity, the lake breeze influence is clearly evident and this is expected to be useful in ongoing investigations. Ground-based remote sensing. USEPA deployed remote sensing instruments for mixed layer height, cloud layer height, column NO2, and column ozone (Vaisala CL51 ceilometers, and UV/visible Pandora spectrometers). The ceilometers were installed at Grafton, WI and Milwaukee, WI, and Zion, IL. The Pandora spectrometers were installed at Sheboygan, Grafton, Milwaukee, Zion, and Schiller Park (Chicago). Data on mixed layer height, ozone column amounts, and NO2 column amounts are being included in ongoing analyses such as comparison to models, comparison to aircraft insitu profiles, and comparison to other remote sensing instruments such a GeoTASO and satellites. Aircraft
measurements. Airborne sampling captured
critical air pollution and meteorological features during LMOS 2017.
The Geostationary Trace gas and Aerosol Sensor Optimization (GeoTASO)
flew 21 research flights on board the NASA LarC UC-12 aircraft. A light
aircraft (Scientific Aviation) flew 22 research flights, measuring NO2,
ozone, carbon dioxide, methane, and meteorological
parameters. Preliminary analysis of these datasets indicates
that they captured their research objectives well, including strong
spatial gradients associated with point and area sources, spatial
gradients associated with oxidative aging of plumes, chemical and
thermal stratification over Lake Michigan, and weekday-weekend
differences in NOx emissions. A preliminary comparison between Pandora,
aircraft, and GeoTASO NO2 profiles has been completed and indicates
satisfactory agreement. Other
mobile platforms. Three additional mobile
platforms operated during LMOS 2017 at the surface: (i) the Geospatial
Monitoring of Air Pollution (GMAP) mobile vehicle sampled ozone in
transects parallel and perpendicular to the shore, (ii) mobile
meteorological and ozone sampling was performed, and (iii) and an
instrumented research ship operated out of Sheboygan with daily
measurements of a number of relevant chemical and meteorological
parameters. Finally, an aerosol and cloud research-grade remote
sampling system, AirHARP was tested from the NASA LarC UC-12 aircraft.
Analysis of these datasets and integration with the other model- and
observation-based analyses is ongoing.
|
|
|
|
Page
maintained by C.
Stanier
|