Wahle A, Prause
GPM, DeJong SC, Sonka M:
20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS), Hong Kong, IEEE Press
Volume 1, Page 506-509, 1998
Validation study for the accuracy and reproducibility of the manual pullback performed in intravascular ultrasound imaging (Paper) (Images) (Links)
Abstract: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) may provide highly accurate information about the cross-sections of coronary and other vessels. By pulling the transducer back inside of the vessel, a continuous stream of cross-sectional data is obtained. However, the images have to be assigned to actual locations and in their proper orientations to allow reliable analyses. In this paper, we focus on the errors introduced by the catheter pullback, which is still performed mostly manually and unsupervised in clinical routine. However, even in idealized in-vitro studies several effects occur. We could measure a real pullback speed of 1.14±0.34mm/s where a constant speed of 1mm was instructed. Absolute orientations and relative twists of the IVUS images were loaded with RMS errors of 24.03° and 5.01°, respectively, between different pullbacks of the same artery. Especially, these errors have to be considered for in-vivo assessments to avoid possible distortions of volumetric and other quantifications.
Full Paper:
in
PostScript format
- gziped PS file, 298
KB
for
Acrobat Reader
- PDF file, 386 KB
Images:
Clip used as
Artificial Landmark for Validation
-
478 columns, 484 rows, 5 KB
Clip
Echo Tolerances within and between Pullbacks
- 869 columns, 551 rows, 125 KB
Results from Manual Pullback
Study
- 429 columns, 982 rows, 15 KB
Links: